The Journal recognises that generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools (e.g., large language models and other AI-assisted writing, translation, coding, image, or data-generation systems) may be used to support certain aspects of scholarly work. To preserve transparency, accountability, and research integrity, the following policy applies to all submissions.
Policy statement: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
1) Authorship and accountability
GenAI tools cannot be listed as authors or co-authors. Authorship implies responsibility for the integrity, accuracy, and originality of the work, which cannot be assumed by an AI system. All named authors remain fully responsible for the content of the manuscript, including any material produced with assistance from GenAI.
2) Permitted uses
Authors may use GenAI tools for limited, supportive purposes such as:
-
improving grammar, spelling, readability, or formatting;
-
language translation (with author verification of technical accuracy);
-
assisting with non-substantive code refactoring or documentation;
-
brainstorming or outlining (provided the final intellectual contribution remains the authors’ own and is fully verified).
Use of GenAI does not exempt authors from standard requirements on originality, citation, permissions, and ethical conduct.
3) Prohibited or restricted uses
Unless explicitly justified and approved as part of the study design, GenAI tools must not be used to:
-
fabricate, falsify, or selectively manipulate data, results, images, or citations;
-
generate references that have not been verified as real, relevant, and correctly cited;
-
produce substantive scientific claims, interpretations, or conclusions that are not independently validated by the authors;
-
create or modify figures, microscopy/diagnostic images, gels/blots, radiographs, or other research images in a way that could misrepresent the underlying observations (routine, clearly described adjustments such as uniform brightness/contrast are permitted where consistent with standard image-integrity practice);
-
circumvent plagiarism detection, authorship standards, or peer-review ethics.
4) Disclosure requirement (mandatory)
Authors must disclose any use of GenAI tools in the manuscript at submission. The disclosure must include:
-
the name and version (where available) of the tool(s) used;
-
the specific purpose (e.g., language editing, translation, coding support);
-
which sections/outputs were materially affected;
-
confirmation that all outputs were reviewed and verified by the authors.
A standard disclosure statement should be placed in the “Acknowledgements”.
Example disclosure (acceptable):
“Generative AI was used to assist with English-language editing and clarity (tool: [name], [version/date]). The authors reviewed and verified all edits and remain responsible for the content.”
5) Data protection and confidentiality
Authors must not input into GenAI systems any confidential, proprietary, or personally identifiable information (including sensitive patient/client data) unless they have a lawful basis and the tool/provider offers an appropriate data-processing agreement and adequate safeguards. Authors remain responsible for ensuring compliance with applicable data protection and confidentiality obligations.
6) Plagiarism, originality, and copyright
Content generated with GenAI must comply with the Veterinaria originality standards. Authors must ensure that text, code, figures, and other outputs do not infringe third-party rights and are appropriately cited where required. GenAI-generated text or paraphrasing must not be used to obscure plagiarism.
7) Peer review and editorial confidentiality
Reviewers and editors must not upload manuscripts, peer-review reports, or editorial correspondence into GenAI tools or external systems that could compromise confidentiality, intellectual property, or anonymisation, unless explicitly authorised by the Journal and compliant with confidentiality requirements.
8) Non-compliance
Failure to disclose GenAI use, or use of GenAI in ways that compromise integrity (e.g., fabricated citations, data/image manipulation, undisclosed AI-generated content), may result in rejection, retraction, notification of institutions or funders, and other actions in accordance with the Journal’s ethics procedures






